FUNDAMENTAL ISSUES OF THE NIGERIAN NATION: The Powers, Conspiracies, Intrigues, the Legacies and How They Affect the Church Today. - Ecclesiachannel Blog

Breaking

BANNER 728X90

Sunday, July 19, 2020

FUNDAMENTAL ISSUES OF THE NIGERIAN NATION: The Powers, Conspiracies, Intrigues, the Legacies and How They Affect the Church Today.

Apart from the fact that the Amalgamation of Nigeria took place in 1914 and the nation obtained her independence in 1960, very little else is known by most Nigerians about the background story of their country. Yet, these are the foundational issues that have continued to play major roles in current developments in Nigeria’s national life. When Martin Luther King declared, “We are not makers of history, we are made by history”, what he was alluding to is that past history shapes current events.

Thus, one of the most treasured resources of any nation is their history. Their nationalism is built around their history and this is what gives them pride in their heritage. It is the one resource that tells them of their origins, heroes, the basis of their union, the different trajectories they have taken and the results they have gotten at different times. It therefore leads to an appreciation of their starting foundations and how one administration after another has built on the initial foundational blocks to get to where they are. So committed are they to their history that, good or bad, painstaking effort is made to preserve it through books, movies and sometimes, yearly anniversaries. According to Marcus Garvey, “A people without the knowledge of their past history, origin and culture, is like a tree without roots.” This readily explains why our people are completely disoriented and have lost virtually all values.

While it has become critically important for Nigerians to become aware of this background history, it has become more so for the Church as it touches on where the Church is in the scheme of things in the nation and the danger the denominations and their congregations face. Armed with adequate information and commitment to prayers, there is no doubt that the Lord will lead His people and give direction as we resolve to seek Him.

In the Book of Isaiah, the Bible says, “The people who walked in darkness have seen a great Light; those who dwelt in the land of intense darkness and the shadow of death, upon them has the Light shined” (Isa 9:2 AMP).

Giving contemporary meaning to this Scripture, the Church of God in Nigeria has been the one dwelling in the land of intense darkness and the shadow of death, without knowing it. When George Santayana pronounced his now famous quote that “Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it”, it would appear that going by events in Nigeria, there is a possibility of a more dire twist: that those who do not know their past stand the possibility of being consumed by it. By the time anyone is through with reading this piece, the precarious position of the Church will be established through concrete historical and contemporary events.

IN THE BEGINNING…

The traditional inhabitants of the geographical space now referred to as Nigeria today were varied: those who may be called the real indigenes include the Negro stock of Native Aboriginal Africans with un-mixed origins deriving their several languages from the Niger-Congo family. Notable among the groups are the Ijaws, Igbos, Yorubas, Kalabaris, Edo, Efiks, Itshekiri, of the southern part and Junkuns, Tivs, Idoma, etc. from the Middle Belt who formed and ran different kingdoms over the years. The Hausas lived in the upper northernmost fringes of what was to become Nigeria. Over time, another group of the Negroid stock, the Fulani, who were not part of the traditional inhabitants, who also have a disdain for the Negro stock, came into Nigeria in the guise of religion. This was through invasion of the Hausa kingdoms.

The traditional inhabitants were largely idol worshippers until the two major faiths came – Christianity through the South and Islam through the North. The Fulani, who lived in different parts of West Africa and historically are from the Futa Jalon area in Guinea, invaded northern Nigeria through a Jihad in 1804 and upon conquering the Hausa states, subsequently set up Fulani emirs to rule and dominate them through the Emirate structure and Sharia as penal code. Incursions were later made southwards around 1835 but they only succeeded as far as Ilorin on the western flank, through betrayal, while the indigenous peoples of the Middle Belt resisted them stoutly.

The Fulani have a consistent strategic pattern of migration which has, till today, not changed. They begin with a peaceful entry into their environments. Within a short space of time, local officials give them land grants. While in their new territory, they begin conversions to Islam and in time, the number of converts increase. While these are going on, no one detects that the            Fulani resent being ruled by pagans or what they term “imperfect Muslims”. Their next strategy is to import more Fulanis with the sole purpose of creating revolts or instigating Jihad against the local rulers and their peoples. With force of arms and element of surprise, the locals are overpowered and an Emirate with Fulani rulership is set up with Sharia as the criminal code. After their victories, the Fulani generally take out their local collaborators from positions of power and forge alliances with fellow Fulani. The template fits their operation so far in Nigeria as we speak . This should be an eye-opener to the raging issues of the grazing reserves, renamed cattle colonies at a time and recently, finally transmuted to National Livestock Transformation Plan to be established in predominantly Christian states.

Christianity, on the other hand, came into Nigeria through Europeans (specifically the British) in the early 1840s through Badagry and later spread to Abeokuta and beyond. While the intention of the Fulanis was to get territories and spread Islam as a religion at the same time, the British also had a dual purpose in coming to Nigeria: the first was religious while the other was the exploitation of resources of Nigeria through trade and commerce.

The hold of the British on Nigeria began with the declaration of Lagos as a British colony in 1861. The army was thereafter brought in to suppress inter-tribal wars that were then a common occurrence and opposition to British traders and middlemen who were going inland to trade by the locals.  The Military thereafter became an expedient institution to maintain the political annexation of Colonies and subdue local authorities while imposing their own rule. This was to later influence the military intervention in democratic rule.

The British were to get more involved with Nigeria because competition for colonial territories and scramble for sources of raw materials and market for finished goods got more intense with the Industrial Revolution. The British opportunity came through Sir George Tubman Goldie, owner of the Royal Niger Company (RNC now UAC), who recruited Lord Lugard in 1894 over his British Charter covering the trading territory over which he had acquired rights which was seconded in 1886. Lugard’s mandate was to secure the Treaty of Bornu and to expand the Company's frontier beyond Lake Chad. To further protect British interests under his command, a West African Frontier Force was raised with headquarters in Jebba. He declared a Protectorate of Northern Nigeria on the 1st of January, 1903.

Simultaneously in the South, British interests also increased through the establishment of the Oil River Protectorate in the Niger Delta in 1885. They subdued other Empires in the South, essentially the Oyo, Benin and Arochukwu. By 1888, the South of Nigeria became a British Protectorate. By 1906, the Yoruba hinterland was conquered and came under British rule. By 1903, Lugard took over the License issued to UAC at the sum of £865,000 sterling. He then merged the Colonies in the South under the Southern Protectorate.

The master stroke that led to the emergence of Nigeria as one nation took place when Lugard amalgamated the Northern and Southern Protectorates into the Colony and Protectorate of Nigeria in 1914, sealing the final fate of the two territories under British rule. Why was this done? Prior to this time, due to lack of resources in the North, the northern administration was run through subvention from the British Treasury. At that time however, the Southern Protectorate was generating a good surplus every year. Lord Harcourt, after whom Port Harcourt is named, who oversaw the Oil Rivers Protectorate sent a memo to the British government indicating that the burden of funding the North could be taken off the British treasury through a marriage with “a Southern Lady of Means” and Lord Lugard would be responsible for performing the ceremony. This was the foundation of the Amalgamation.

Through the Amalgamation, the colonial government then used the resources of the profitable South to run the Affairs of the North and fund the development of the North at the same time. This was the foundation for the exploitation of the resources of the South to develop the North which has been fraudulently perfected decade upon decade since then and has become a major fault line of the nation state that emerged till today.

From that time, the subjugation of Christianity began as Lugard agreed to maintain all pledges and undertakings which had been assumed by the RNC including the Policy of not supporting Christian Missions in the Muslim North while allowing missionaries in the Middle Belt. This restricted Western education in the Muslim North.  He supported the Indirect Rule system as it was practiced in India using the Emirs as different from the Southern system of administration.

SUSTAINING STRATEGIES

What Nigeria is experiencing today is the outworking of the grand plan by the British based on the perception of the Colonial Grand Masters.  It is clear that they preferred to hand over to non-indigenous African (Settlers) minority instead of the African Negroes, the majority. Of particular note, when all these began, was the disdain in which Lugard held the educated elite of the South, especially Lagos. The reason for this is not far-fetched. By 1821, the Yorubas had produced their first graduate. The effect of this was enlightenment that made them stand before the colonialists as equals and this troubled them. The North was to produce their first graduate in 1957 and this was a Yoruba northerner from Kwara. This explains why there can never be any progress in Nigeria as long as the status quo handed to the Fulani subsists because the terms they agreed with the British was to continuously make Nigeria economically open to British exploitation in exchange for continued support to hold on to the reins of power in Nigeria.

What were the principal strategies adopted by the British to keep things that way? In order to control and ensure the continuous protection of the economic and political interest of the colonial master mostly located in the more educationally advanced but “politically antagonistic” South, the North was nurtured and brought forth as neo-colonial successor to the titled colonial masters in continuity of the governing structures. The core North, being an aristocratic Islamic evangelist resent any form of integration that will threaten their religion, culture and customs, hence their drive towards pro-Islamic policies at pre and post-independence. In line with the primary objectives of the colonial master, it was then imperative that political and military power should reside with and in the domain of their successor-in-title. The Caliphate exercises this trust over Nigeria till today.

In advancing their interests, the Fulani in Nigeria, capitalised on this legacy. The question can then be asked, “Why have the Fulani succeeded for so long in Nigeria?” The direct answer lies in four articulated and syndicated Visions which remain most active and are visibly manifesting in all areas of public life, even after 58 years of “independence”, triggering the crisis ridden politics and society and accounting for various agitations concerning marginalization that has not abated till now. What were these vision statements?

1.       VISION OF EXPLOITATION: originally introduced by Lord Harcourt (Omoruyi page 300). According to Harcourt as he spoke about the imperative of the amalgamation, “We have released Northern Nigeria from the leading strings of the Treasury. The promising and well conducted youth is now on allowance on his own and he is about to effect an alliance with a Southern Lady of Means. I have issued the special license and Sir Fredrick Lugard will perform the ceremony. May the union be fruitful and the couple constant”. From the starting blocks, the South was programmed to feed the North. They have kept it that way.

2. VISION OF SUBJUGATION: This is the origin of the “Born to Rule” philosophy and it was laid by Lugard. In a report by Lord Lugard to the British Parliament on Northern Nigeria, he is quoted to have written: “I believed myself that the future of the virile races of this Protectorate lies largely in the regeneration of the Fulani….. Nor have we the means at present to administer such a vast country.  This then is the policy to which, in my view, the administration of the Northern Nigeria should give effect, viz, to regenerate this capable race and mould them to ideas of Justice and mercy, so that in a future generation, if not in this, they may become worthy instruments of rule.  My desire to utilize the Fulani as rulers has been described in a former report and has met with the approval of the Secretary of State… I hope and I believe that with careful guidance, their sons and grandsons will form invaluable rulers under British supervision and their superior intelligence can be developed as a useful asset in our administration”. (Page 26, Paragraph 36 of 1902 Northern Nigerian Report by Lord Lugard to the British Parliament.  Cited on Page 275 by Sir Olaniwun Ajayi “Nigerian African Failed Asset”. Evidence confirmed in writing of Memoirs that succeeding Governors of Nigeria observe this vision in its strictest sense and in all ramifications.)

It is on record that the successors of Lugard continued the policies and legacy of treating the North as a special partner to the British and the dominant partner in the Nigerian Project. These continuing policies in contemporary Nigeria remain at the root of under-development, backwardness, lopsided federation and lately, the cruel persecution of Christians.

3. VISION OF SUBORDINATION:  In 1804, Othman Dan Fodio declared that he will dip the Koran into the sea and this has been a standing mantra with the Caliphate. This has since then been taken as the Caliphate’s Islamic Condition for Unity by Emirate-in-Council. Thus, in the Report of 1942 Northern Chiefs Conference and in response to the West African Student Union’s plea in London for the cooperation of the Northern Rulers with their Southern Counterparts, the Emir’s response was, “Holding this country together is not possible except by means of the religion of the Prophet... if they want political unity, let them follow our religion”.   (Cited on Page 238 of Olanihun Ajayi’s book.)

As further evidence, the late Prime Minister, Tafawa Balewa, during the debates on the Constitutional Conference in Ibadan angrily declared that if there was a breakdown in independence negotiations, the North will continue its march towards the sea, which was interrupted by the British adventure into Nigeria.

4. VISION OF DOMINATION: The North, taking its bearing from the vision of Lord Lugard drew up a Manifesto which was articulated in 1960 and succinctly stated by the Premier of Northern Region, The Sardauna of Sokoto, Sir Ahmadu Bello: “The New nation called Nigeria should be an estate of our great grandfather, Usman Dan Fodio; we must ruthlessly prevent a change of power.  We must use the northern minority as willing tools and the South as conquered territory and never allow them to rule over us and never allow them to have control of their future”.

Maybe anyone can understand why they always want to rule and why, after dividing the country into four regions, rather than rotation among the four, a North/South rotation equation was used. Either way, others lose.

EFFORTS AT UNITY

Since amalgamation, several efforts by the British and subsequent governments have not achieved unity. Many people are agreed today that Nigeria is yet to become a nation. This is because of the differing ideologies as we earlier described. For instance, Alhaji Tafawa Balewa, during his remarks on unity in 1948, said, “Since 1914, the British have been trying to make Nigeria into one country but the Nigerian people themselves are historically different in their backgrounds, in their religious beliefs and in their customs and do not show themselves any signs of willingness to unite”.

Awolowo, one of the major actors of independence, in 1947, had this to say: “Nigeria is not a nation. It is a mere geographic expression. There are no “Nigerians” in the same sense as there are “English”, Welsh” or “French”. The word ‘Nigerian’ is merely a distinctive appellation to distinguish those who live within the boundaries of Nigeria and those who do not”.

In a later comment in 1964, after Zik had become Governor General, his expression of frustration about Nigerian unity came forth in the following words: “It is better for us and many admirers abroad that we should disintegrate in peace and not in pieces. Should the politicians fail to heed this warning, then I will venture to predict that the experience of the Democratic Republic of the Congo will be a child’s play if ever it comes to our turn to play such a tragic role.” The issue of Nigerian unity has remained a mirage and it should be clear where the problem had been coming from. These were part of the underlying reasons for the Civil War.

 

NIGERIA TODAY

A number of things should be clear from the way the Fulani have run Nigeria, fully aided by the British, their partners in majority subjugation:

1. They make no separation between Islam and politics. Rather, as someone said authoritatively: “The Fulani have no capacity to be loyal to anyone except to power and their loyalty to Islam is only to the extent that it helps them get power”.

2. Secular status is not acceptable to Islamists (radical Muslims) and a primary ideology is to exclude non-Muslims from strategic institutions regardless of numerical superiority or rotational/zoning principles. Thus, while Nigeria is supposed to have a secular Constitution, favouring no religion or faith, Islamists ensured that the present 1999 Constitution is not neutral. In the  Constitution, the word Sharia is mentioned 73 times; Islam, 28 times; Grand Kadi, 54 times; Muslim, 10 times; while the words Christ, Christian, Christianity and Church have no single mention at all. Through the Islamist agenda, a number of other things have been achieved:

• Ensured that no major political post is filled in Nigeria without the express approval of the Caliphate. How did this begin? After the 1959 elections, because there was no clear winner, Azikiwe’s party, the NCNC, entered into an alliance with Ahmadu Bello’s party, the Northern Peoples Congress (NPC). Azikiwe became Governor General, a mere titular position, while Ahmadu Bello, who was Premier of Northern Nigeria was required to move to Lagos to assume office as the Prime Minister. He refused on the basis of the fact that he was Sultan of Sokoto and deployed Alhaji Tafawa Balewa to represent him in Lagos. While Balewa was Prime Minister, all appointments and favours were granted from Sokoto. Till today, this tradition has made Sokoto the seat of power in Nigeria, enshrined god-fatherism and the use of political power for personal ends as statecraft in Nigeria.

• Orchestrated movement of  Nigeria's capital from Lagos to the North.

• Took Nigeria into the Organisation of Islamic Countries (OIC) More recently, the country was also dragged into the membership of the D8 nations comprising Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Malaysia, Pakistan and Turkey, all of which are Islamic countries.

3. In most of the Muslim populated North, Christians are treated like people without rights. Most of the Churches in the prominent cities are located on the outskirts of the town. Most of the Churches within towns have been burnt. Domination of Christians in the North who are indigenes of their States is a major feature.

4. They entrench strategies to unify the North but divide the South. To begin with, the colonial masters deliberately began the strengthening of the North against the South when population figures were always altered to give the impression that the North is more populous. Then while they left the North homogenous, they divided the South into the West and the East. By 1963, they further divided the South by creating the Mid-West. The statistics of states and local governments in Nigeria in the North and South are classic confirmations of what started with the British.

 

5. They always find willing tools among Christians to do their hatchet jobs with inducements of position, appointment or finances. Look closely at what is going on in Nigeria even today. When you now place the discussed template on everything that has happened in Nigeria before and after independence - coups, appointments, elections and results, name it - you find the template fits.

 

Concluding Core-North Mentality

The North, especially the Hausa Fulani, has come to the conclusion that they are born to rule while the South is born to serve them. A columnist, Mohammad Adamu, wrote in Africa Concord Magazine in April 1977: “What we do know, however, is that God's choice of a people manifest in two forms, namely direct command (as with the Covenant between God and the Jews) and tacit approval (as in God's approval of Hausa-Fulani to rule)…. We the Hausa Fulani are chosen specially by God to rule. No apologies to the Yorubas, no apologies to the Ibos….. the minorities are not in doubt about this matter....”  (Cited in Page 143 by O. Ajayi). The slogan of Sokoto State was recently changed from “Born to Rule” to “Seat of the Caliphate” to mask the agenda.

 

CURRENT THREATS TO THE CHURCH

In the face of all these developments unknown to many in Nigeria, especially the Church, what agenda did the Church or any other part of the Nigerian nation articulate at any time to counter any of these standing visions and where is the Church who STILL has the mandate of The Great Commission and the brief to “Occupy” till Jesus comes, in the scheme of things? We have remained totally ignorant and oblivious in the ‘Valley of the Shadow of Death’. Unless the Church arises, and quickly too, it is doubtful whether there will be major Christian activity anywhere in Nigeria within the next two years for the following reasons:

1. The persecutions that have been experienced in the Middle Belt and the Christian parts of the North is actually a Jihad in the making with the aim of ethnic cleansing to facilitate the takeover of these communities by the Fulani using the face of Islam. The Boko Haram and more recently, the Fulani Herdsmen were commissioned by the powers that be in Islam so that they can work behind the scenes while they look away. This is no speculation; it is already a reality in many places in the Middle Belt.

2. The grand plan is to execute what they have done so far in the Middle Belt in other places in the South, starting with the Yoruba States and when these are overcome (God forbid), there will be a joint swooping on the East. If they succeed in carrying out this plan, all the fancy cathedrals of the South may be taken over and converted to mosques as they have done with more than 400 churches in the UK.

3. For the execution of invasion of the South West, South South and South East, their foot-soldiers have been massively infiltrating all the major towns of the South where arrangements have been concluded with necessary equipment concealed for their dastardly plan.

4. Their plan was to conclude these invasions and transmute Nigeria into a Fulani empire’ where they will use the instrument of Islam to set up Emirates in all the cities of the south that will take over their traditional institutions as they did to the Hausa states in Northern Nigeria. These plans were however, revealed to various intercessors in Nigeria and their prayers have so far held matters at bay.

5.The 2019 elections are critical and the reason they are rabidly interested in securing a Fulani presidency is to complete the work of the Jihad across the country immediately after they get the mandate and conclude it before there will be new elections in 2023. They have succeeded half-way as they have strategically achieved Fulani candidates in the two main political parties that they have calculated to throw up an undisputed Fulani as President in 2019.

6. The only antidote to this madness is for the entire Christian Church to come together. It is sad that ignorant Christians are among the loudest people clamouring for Fulani candidates and declaring that we have no other alternative. In the meantime, the Fulani are quiet, enjoying the foolishness of the generality of the public even as the two candidates run the show as if they are bitter enemies.

7. Tactfully, and as usual, they are promising the Presidency to the South West and the East at the same time to get the leaders of both zones to work energetically for the success of their Fulani candidate. All these are to keep the leaders from deciphering their agenda.

8. The restructuring of the nation's security architecture to comprise of almost Fulani to provide cover for the Jihad (as they have done so far) should remove any doubt in the mind of anyone about the veracity of this agenda. While this is obvious, through stealth Jihad, they have taken over virtually all ministries and parastatals in Nigeria and dominate Southern Nigeria by biological Jihadcum orchestrated migrations.

 

THE CHURCH: GOING FORWARD

An understanding of the foregoing issues shows that the caption in Isaiah 9:2 adequately captures the current state of the Church. The political life of the nation has been manipulated as the Church went a-slumbering, competing for cathedrals and preaching prosperity. Now, two Fulani candidates in the 2019 general elections stare us in the face. For anyone to believe the promises that are being made that the persecution will stop is to fail to understand the Islamic concept of Taqquiya - which approves of Muslims to lie acceptably as long as it is for the propagation of Islam. While the stance of the current administration is undisguised, the main challenger, touted as the more liberal of the two candidates, unknown to many, began his campaign by covenanting at the tomb of Othman Dan Fodio to Islamism before beginning his campaign in Sokoto.

The only solution is for the entire Christian Church, now that they have subtly cut off the promising Christian challenger, to now fully and earnestly look to God for deliverance as He did for the children of Israel at the bank of the Red Sea. It is a grand deception for anyone to believe that any Muslim will muster the political will to stop a Jihad, an idea which is against the tenets of Islam. It is unfortunate, as we speak, that the certain persons have been tricked to believe that the current government will hand over to them in 2023. One wonders if they heard of Afonja of Ilorin, Bashorun MKO Abiola, J. S. Tarka, etc.

While we pray and wait, what is not in doubt is the need for a high level of networking among pastors and overseers in the country for the singular purpose of educating their congregations.


No comments:

Post a Comment